<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exchange 2010 Client Throttling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shudnow.net/2009/09/26/exchange-2010-client-throttling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/09/26/exchange-2010-client-throttling/</link>
	<description>Just another IT guy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:49:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nima</title>
		<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/09/26/exchange-2010-client-throttling/comment-page-1/#comment-11301</link>
		<dc:creator>Nima</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 23:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shudnow.net/?p=1252#comment-11301</guid>
		<description>I am not sure but it seems to me based on your description of MaxConcurrency, the following line should correctly read .. 
 
 So if a user has let&#8217;s say 15 connections open, 5 of those connections should BE disconnected.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure but it seems to me based on your description of MaxConcurrency, the following line should correctly read .. </p>
<p> So if a user has let&rsquo;s say 15 connections open, 5 of those connections should BE disconnected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Sterling</title>
		<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/09/26/exchange-2010-client-throttling/comment-page-1/#comment-8534</link>
		<dc:creator>David Sterling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shudnow.net/?p=1252#comment-8534</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post.  A few comments: 
 
1.  CPUStart is *only* used by EWS.  Once the average CPU utilization of EWS exceeds this percentage value, inbound requests will be delayed to keep EWS process CPU utilization down.  This was added so that EWS would not create poor user experience for OWA users being serviced from the same box. 
2.  MaxConcurrency has nothing to do with CPUStart.  If the current caller tries to exceed their concurrency limit, then the new requests will be killed - this is a hard limit.  So with a MaxConcurrency limit of 10 you could never have a case where the caller has 15 connections. 
 
David Sterling [MSFT] 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post.  A few comments: </p>
<p>1.  CPUStart is *only* used by EWS.  Once the average CPU utilization of EWS exceeds this percentage value, inbound requests will be delayed to keep EWS process CPU utilization down.  This was added so that EWS would not create poor user experience for OWA users being serviced from the same box.<br />
2.  MaxConcurrency has nothing to do with CPUStart.  If the current caller tries to exceed their concurrency limit, then the new requests will be killed &#8211; this is a hard limit.  So with a MaxConcurrency limit of 10 you could never have a case where the caller has 15 connections. </p>
<p>David Sterling [MSFT]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elan Shudnow</title>
		<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/09/26/exchange-2010-client-throttling/comment-page-1/#comment-8261</link>
		<dc:creator>Elan Shudnow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shudnow.net/?p=1252#comment-8261</guid>
		<description>If you want to limit their connections regardless of how much CPU utilization your Exchange Server has, then yes.  If you want to limit only certain users, then you can create a new policy and apply this policy only to those specific users.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to limit their connections regardless of how much CPU utilization your Exchange Server has, then yes.  If you want to limit only certain users, then you can create a new policy and apply this policy only to those specific users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Crowley</title>
		<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/09/26/exchange-2010-client-throttling/comment-page-1/#comment-8260</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Crowley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 18:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shudnow.net/?p=1252#comment-8260</guid>
		<description>So if we want to ensure one person doesnt use a million connections, regardless of server load, we should set cpustart to zero? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if we want to ensure one person doesnt use a million connections, regardless of server load, we should set cpustart to zero?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brent</title>
		<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/09/26/exchange-2010-client-throttling/comment-page-1/#comment-8252</link>
		<dc:creator>brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shudnow.net/?p=1252#comment-8252</guid>
		<description>cool post. Only issue with throttling isnt you wont be alerted to users doing the *dodgy* things on your system. (althought a crippled exchange server isn&#039;t really the best way of finding out about your dodgy users) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cool post. Only issue with throttling isnt you wont be alerted to users doing the *dodgy* things on your system. (althought a crippled exchange server isn&#039;t really the best way of finding out about your dodgy users)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Exchange 2010 Client Throttling &#124; Elan Shudnow's Blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/09/26/exchange-2010-client-throttling/comment-page-1/#comment-8251</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Exchange 2010 Client Throttling &#124; Elan Shudnow's Blog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shudnow.net/?p=1252#comment-8251</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by NGN NetGeNoten. NGN NetGeNoten said: Goed artikel: Exchange 2010 Client Throttling http://bit.ly/148eUH [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by NGN NetGeNoten. NGN NetGeNoten said: Goed artikel: Exchange 2010 Client Throttling <a href="http://bit.ly/148eUH" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/148eUH</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

