<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Office Communications Server 2007 R2 Audio/Media Negotiation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shudnow.net/2009/08/29/office-communications-server-2007-r2-audiomedia-negotiation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/08/29/office-communications-server-2007-r2-audiomedia-negotiation/</link>
	<description>Just another IT guy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:37:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eshudnow</title>
		<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/08/29/office-communications-server-2007-r2-audiomedia-negotiation/comment-page-1/#comment-10307</link>
		<dc:creator>eshudnow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shudnow.net/?p=1203#comment-10307</guid>
		<description>Just don&#039;t open UDP.  The ICE connection testing process tests both TCP and UDP at the same time, and if both works, UDP is provided to the client.  If UDP fails but TCP works, TCP is provided to the client.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just don&#039;t open UDP.  The ICE connection testing process tests both TCP and UDP at the same time, and if both works, UDP is provided to the client.  If UDP fails but TCP works, TCP is provided to the client.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ravi Biradar</title>
		<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/08/29/office-communications-server-2007-r2-audiomedia-negotiation/comment-page-1/#comment-10292</link>
		<dc:creator>Ravi Biradar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shudnow.net/?p=1203#comment-10292</guid>
		<description>Hi Elan . 
I am using External user  
I want block UDP ports or make udp ports unreachable so that ICE negotiation happens only in TCP, how to go about it any docs? 
 
Thanks in Advance, 
Ravi </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Elan .<br />
I am using External user<br />
I want block UDP ports or make udp ports unreachable so that ICE negotiation happens only in TCP, how to go about it any docs? </p>
<p>Thanks in Advance,<br />
Ravi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moto822</title>
		<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/08/29/office-communications-server-2007-r2-audiomedia-negotiation/comment-page-1/#comment-10277</link>
		<dc:creator>moto822</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shudnow.net/?p=1203#comment-10277</guid>
		<description>Hi All, 
 
So if I am understanding correctly, I need to open up 3478 or 443 from my client network to my DMZ to get peer to peer to work? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi All, </p>
<p>So if I am understanding correctly, I need to open up 3478 or 443 from my client network to my DMZ to get peer to peer to work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elan Shudnow</title>
		<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/08/29/office-communications-server-2007-r2-audiomedia-negotiation/comment-page-1/#comment-10252</link>
		<dc:creator>Elan Shudnow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shudnow.net/?p=1203#comment-10252</guid>
		<description>Thanks, will update.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, will update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrRez</title>
		<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/08/29/office-communications-server-2007-r2-audiomedia-negotiation/comment-page-1/#comment-10250</link>
		<dc:creator>DrRez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 05:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shudnow.net/?p=1203#comment-10250</guid>
		<description>Good article Elan. I confirmed with the principal program manager for media in Microsoft&#039;s Communications Server team. There&#039;s a slight incorrection. UDP 3478 and TCP 443 are tried in parallel, not in sequential order. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article Elan. I confirmed with the principal program manager for media in Microsoft&#039;s Communications Server team. There&#039;s a slight incorrection. UDP 3478 and TCP 443 are tried in parallel, not in sequential order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eshudnow</title>
		<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/08/29/office-communications-server-2007-r2-audiomedia-negotiation/comment-page-1/#comment-10242</link>
		<dc:creator>eshudnow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shudnow.net/?p=1203#comment-10242</guid>
		<description>I believe so.  This is the 1 scenario I&#039;m not 100% certain on.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe so.  This is the 1 scenario I&#039;m not 100% certain on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eshudnow</title>
		<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/08/29/office-communications-server-2007-r2-audiomedia-negotiation/comment-page-1/#comment-10238</link>
		<dc:creator>eshudnow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 16:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shudnow.net/?p=1203#comment-10238</guid>
		<description>I learned this through Escalation Engineer where he told me this and we verified it via the log files that Communicator generates.  It&#039;s also discussed on a webcast that Byron Spurlock presents in.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I learned this through Escalation Engineer where he told me this and we verified it via the log files that Communicator generates.  It&#039;s also discussed on a webcast that Byron Spurlock presents in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pawel</title>
		<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/08/29/office-communications-server-2007-r2-audiomedia-negotiation/comment-page-1/#comment-10220</link>
		<dc:creator>Pawel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 19:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shudnow.net/?p=1203#comment-10220</guid>
		<description>Hi Elan! 
 
Many thanks for great article.  
I was thrilled to find out that scenario described in &quot;Two Users Internal to the Network (media ports closed)&quot; section is true indeed. 
Is this documented somewhere on MS technet? 
I thought that in case of p2p failuer two internal users would connect via Front-End server, like in case of every conference. 
Why are they routed via Edge? 
 
My question: 
If I force clients from two separate sites (subnets) to use required minimum 40 media ports, does this mean that amount of concurrent calls between  these sites is limited?  
Each Communicator p2p call uses min. a few media ports, so max. number of conurrent calls is like ~10 in this case? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Elan! </p>
<p>Many thanks for great article.<br />
I was thrilled to find out that scenario described in &quot;Two Users Internal to the Network (media ports closed)&quot; section is true indeed.<br />
Is this documented somewhere on MS technet?<br />
I thought that in case of p2p failuer two internal users would connect via Front-End server, like in case of every conference.<br />
Why are they routed via Edge? </p>
<p>My question:<br />
If I force clients from two separate sites (subnets) to use required minimum 40 media ports, does this mean that amount of concurrent calls between  these sites is limited?<br />
Each Communicator p2p call uses min. a few media ports, so max. number of conurrent calls is like ~10 in this case?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/08/29/office-communications-server-2007-r2-audiomedia-negotiation/comment-page-1/#comment-10218</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shudnow.net/?p=1203#comment-10218</guid>
		<description>Is it possible to require 128 bit encryption on port 443 for the Edge server since it is Internet facing even though MOC clients use 128 bit already? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible to require 128 bit encryption on port 443 for the Edge server since it is Internet facing even though MOC clients use 128 bit already?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed Khalil</title>
		<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/08/29/office-communications-server-2007-r2-audiomedia-negotiation/comment-page-1/#comment-10214</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed Khalil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 06:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shudnow.net/?p=1203#comment-10214</guid>
		<description>Hi Shudnow, 
Please confirm the following:  
If two users on the Internet can&#039;t start Peer to Peer connections, they will bridge the communications betwen them by using A/V Edge. 
Is that means also they will have A/V Edge in the middel all the time for the Peer to Peer connection. 
 
Regards </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Shudnow,<br />
Please confirm the following:<br />
If two users on the Internet can&#039;t start Peer to Peer connections, they will bridge the communications betwen them by using A/V Edge.<br />
Is that means also they will have A/V Edge in the middel all the time for the Peer to Peer connection. </p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
