<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Default Gateways and Multihomed Edge Boxes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shudnow.net/2009/02/01/default-gateways-and-multihomed-boxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/02/01/default-gateways-and-multihomed-boxes/</link>
	<description>Just another IT guy!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 14:25:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ISA Default Gateways &#38; Creating Static Routes &#171; Slvrfxms&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/02/01/default-gateways-and-multihomed-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-9860</link>
		<dc:creator>ISA Default Gateways &#38; Creating Static Routes &#171; Slvrfxms&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 12:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shudnow.net/?p=822#comment-9860</guid>
		<description>[...] could not contact our issuing CA for a client certificate, I came across a great blog entry ( http://www.shudnow.net/2009/02/01/default-gateways-and-multihomed-boxes/ ) explaining the need for static routes on multi-homed servers.  In the case of ISA, we have two [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] could not contact our issuing CA for a client certificate, I came across a great blog entry ( <a href="http://www.shudnow.net/2009/02/01/default-gateways-and-multihomed-boxes/ )" rel="nofollow">http://www.shudnow.net/2009/02/01/default-gateways-and-multihomed-boxes/ )</a> explaining the need for static routes on multi-homed servers.  In the case of ISA, we have two [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bamboo Partner Blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/02/01/default-gateways-and-multihomed-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-6749</link>
		<dc:creator>Bamboo Partner Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shudnow.net/?p=822#comment-6749</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Multihomed IIS Servers...&lt;/strong&gt;

I was setting up a staging server this week to demo some our projects and products to clients, and ran...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Multihomed IIS Servers&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I was setting up a staging server this week to demo some our projects and products to clients, and ran&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elan Shudnow</title>
		<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/02/01/default-gateways-and-multihomed-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-6614</link>
		<dc:creator>Elan Shudnow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 04:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shudnow.net/?p=822#comment-6614</guid>
		<description>Good to know.  Thanks for following up Kamil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to know.  Thanks for following up Kamil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kamil</title>
		<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/02/01/default-gateways-and-multihomed-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-6607</link>
		<dc:creator>Kamil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 13:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shudnow.net/?p=822#comment-6607</guid>
		<description>Hi Elan, 

I have found the reason of my problem. You need to enable weak host model on Windows 2008 to make Edge working fine:

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2007.09.cableguy.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Elan, </p>
<p>I have found the reason of my problem. You need to enable weak host model on Windows 2008 to make Edge working fine:</p>
<p><a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2007.09.cableguy.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2007.09.cableguy.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elan Shudnow</title>
		<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/02/01/default-gateways-and-multihomed-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-6584</link>
		<dc:creator>Elan Shudnow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shudnow.net/?p=822#comment-6584</guid>
		<description>Yep, I have done this with OCS R2 Edge as well on Server 2008.  Not sure what may be causing it.  I have seen a forum thread where people configuring NLB on Server 2008 required gateways on both NICs for things to work properly but didn&#039;t have to on Server 2003.  I wonder if there&#039;s some sort of connection there where if something is a specific way on Server 2008 then it will work fine where if something is another way it won&#039;t work fine.  Not sure, I&#039;d have to have that issue myself to troubleshoot and see what&#039;s going on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, I have done this with OCS R2 Edge as well on Server 2008.  Not sure what may be causing it.  I have seen a forum thread where people configuring NLB on Server 2008 required gateways on both NICs for things to work properly but didn&#8217;t have to on Server 2003.  I wonder if there&#8217;s some sort of connection there where if something is a specific way on Server 2008 then it will work fine where if something is another way it won&#8217;t work fine.  Not sure, I&#8217;d have to have that issue myself to troubleshoot and see what&#8217;s going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kamil</title>
		<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/02/01/default-gateways-and-multihomed-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-6583</link>
		<dc:creator>Kamil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shudnow.net/?p=822#comment-6583</guid>
		<description>Hi Elan,

I have Edge R2 version setup on Windows 2008 with four NIC&#039;s - three public IP&#039;s, one internal.

When i setup only one gateway on access edge NIC, add routes to internal networks through Internal NIC, traffic from/to Access edge and from/to Internal NIC works fine, but web conferencing Edge and A/V Edge does not work at all. Live Meeting does not start externally, I must have default gateways setup on all Public NIC&#039;s to start Live Meeting externally. Have you checked your setup on Windows 2008 ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Elan,</p>
<p>I have Edge R2 version setup on Windows 2008 with four NIC&#8217;s &#8211; three public IP&#8217;s, one internal.</p>
<p>When i setup only one gateway on access edge NIC, add routes to internal networks through Internal NIC, traffic from/to Access edge and from/to Internal NIC works fine, but web conferencing Edge and A/V Edge does not work at all. Live Meeting does not start externally, I must have default gateways setup on all Public NIC&#8217;s to start Live Meeting externally. Have you checked your setup on Windows 2008 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Crowley</title>
		<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/02/01/default-gateways-and-multihomed-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-6393</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Crowley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shudnow.net/?p=822#comment-6393</guid>
		<description>Again, thanks for your time and discussion here.  I&#039;ll post back if I learn anything else!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, thanks for your time and discussion here.  I&#8217;ll post back if I learn anything else!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elan Shudnow</title>
		<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/02/01/default-gateways-and-multihomed-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-6390</link>
		<dc:creator>Elan Shudnow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 05:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shudnow.net/?p=822#comment-6390</guid>
		<description>You probably already know what I&#039;m about to say, but figured I&#039;d say it anyways.  It&#039;s in regards to your Cluster not detecting what site it&#039;s in.  One thing to keep in consideration is that even though with Server 2008 you can have 4 subnets, both the subnets that the CMS will use (your corporate subnets for the CMS) must be part of the same Site (Stretched AD Site).

So if you have 10.10.10.2/24 for your Node1 in Datacenter A and 10.10.20.2/24 for your Node2 in Datacenter B, the 10.10.10.x and 10.10.20.x subnet have to be a part of the same AD Site.  For your private NICs, they don&#039;t have to really be a part of the same AD Site but will obviously have to route to each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You probably already know what I&#8217;m about to say, but figured I&#8217;d say it anyways.  It&#8217;s in regards to your Cluster not detecting what site it&#8217;s in.  One thing to keep in consideration is that even though with Server 2008 you can have 4 subnets, both the subnets that the CMS will use (your corporate subnets for the CMS) must be part of the same Site (Stretched AD Site).</p>
<p>So if you have 10.10.10.2/24 for your Node1 in Datacenter A and 10.10.20.2/24 for your Node2 in Datacenter B, the 10.10.10.x and 10.10.20.x subnet have to be a part of the same AD Site.  For your private NICs, they don&#8217;t have to really be a part of the same AD Site but will obviously have to route to each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elan Shudnow</title>
		<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/02/01/default-gateways-and-multihomed-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-6389</link>
		<dc:creator>Elan Shudnow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 03:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shudnow.net/?p=822#comment-6389</guid>
		<description>No, I&#039;m not with PSS and don&#039;t work for Microsoft.  Sorry.  And ya, I do agree an article on Multi-Subnet Clusters would be a good article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I&#8217;m not with PSS and don&#8217;t work for Microsoft.  Sorry.  And ya, I do agree an article on Multi-Subnet Clusters would be a good article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Crowley</title>
		<link>http://www.shudnow.net/2009/02/01/default-gateways-and-multihomed-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-6386</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Crowley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shudnow.net/?p=822#comment-6386</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your response.
You work with PSS, right?  Perhaps you could take a look at SRX090114600383.  I just glanced at your SCC link, and what its lacking is Server 2008&#039;s ability to use routable public and private networks.  So in a 2 node cluster, you could have 4 subnets.  I could really use a good example of a properly configured SCC multi-subnet cluster (routes and addresses used on each interface)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your response.<br />
You work with PSS, right?  Perhaps you could take a look at SRX090114600383.  I just glanced at your SCC link, and what its lacking is Server 2008&#8242;s ability to use routable public and private networks.  So in a 2 node cluster, you could have 4 subnets.  I could really use a good example of a properly configured SCC multi-subnet cluster (routes and addresses used on each interface)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
